blog
tyblography

categories

architecture (29)
on location (21)
random thoughts (1,262)
staff (27)
the design life (289)
the writing life (414)
blog archive




It Tolls for Thee

My daughter told me a joke the other day:

“Knock, knock.”
“Who’s there?”
“To.”
“To who?”
“To whom.”

Pretty good, right? Of course, you have to actually care about the distinction between who and whom to think it’s funny. Which brings us to this post over at The Economist‘s website, one of the points of which is that “[t]he unease over whom just makes people avoid it more.”

For you geeks out there, it’s who for subjects, whom for objects. But most of us don’t want to get all that involved with determining subjects and objects—including me. So I just stick to a rule I first learned from William F. Buckley, Jr.: follow a preposition with whom (to whom, by whom, for whom, et al.). Use who everywhere else. Seems to work.

Spokane Scene no. 6

Eager patrons stand in line at the loukoumades truck at the 77th annual Greek Dinner Festival last Friday. Hosted by Holy Trinity Greek Orthodox Church, the event features an incredible menu, bakery items, church tours, dancing, and, of course, the aforementioned loukoumades—little puffs of deep-fried goodness that once were served by the ancient Greeks to Olympic champions.

Immodesty, Thy Name Is Facebook

One more post about Facebook, then I’m done. For reals.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AkH2coBaQUQ

Try to watch this without laughing. Go on—I dare you. It’s a bit cheeky coming from a company that lost $50 billion in share value in a little over three months, don’t you think?

But what’s worse is the grandiosity of it all. Does Facebook really think it’s the only thing that stands between us and a “vast” and “dark” universe? “We make the tools and services that allow people to feel human, get together, open up,” explains head of consumer marketing Rebecca Van Dyck. C’mon. Who honestly believes that? (Besides Wieden & Kennedy, the ad agency that foisted this bombastic load of navel-gazing codswallop on us.)

The seriousness with which this company takes itself is mind-boggling. But I think it’s really just a larger symptom of the way in which agencies and design firms—and their clients—have come to fetishize brand. It’s not enough to have a billion people actively using your product (which in and of itself is a truly remarkable feat); no, you’ve got to get all metaphysical on us. Hey Facebook: You’re a social networking site. That’s all. Now, go earn your shareholders some money.

With Friends Like These…

I was on Facebook once. It lasted about six months. I made connections with a couple of old high school friends I hadn’t seen for 20-some years, but that was about all I got out of it. What ultimately drove me away was the ceaseless torrent of political commentary that was less about actual conversation than it was about intellectual and emotional bullying.

But even the bullying would’ve been at least somewhat tolerable if it weren’t for the condescension and contempt with which “friends” treated those whose only crime was—gasp!—disagreeing with them.

So what gives? Elizabeth Bernstein has some thoughts on what makes us so aggressive online, and how social media turns otherwise decent folk into insufferable jerks:

Most of us present an enhanced image of ourselves on Facebook. This positive image—and the encouragement we get, in the form of “likes”—boosts our self-esteem. And when we have an inflated sense of self, we tend to exhibit poor self-control.

Keith Wilcox, a professor at Columbia and one of the co-authors of a study linking Facebook use with everything from higher body mass to lower credit scores, adds that this type of behavior is “often displayed by people impaired by alcohol.”

Sounds about right to me.

On Prescriptivists and Descriptivists

Should dictionaries tell you how language should be used? Or should they simply report on language as it’s actually being used?

While in general I prefer a prescriptivist (the “how” party) approach, it seems that there’s certainly room for compromise. Over at The Weekly Standard—in an article chock full of awesome word geekery—David Skinnner agrees, and reveals the “spirited prejudices” of both sides.

Friday Frivolity

Is there a better headline than “Buddhist ‘Iron Man’ found by Nazis is from space“? I don’t think so.

Monster alligators in Mississippi: “This is not the first record to come from Issaquena County and probably will not be the last.”

An oldie but goodie: The Illustrated Guide to a Ph.D.

First-prize winner at the April 1894 Covent Garden Fancy Dress Ball? The guy who went as a side of bacon, obviously.

And finally, alternative versions of famous monuments.

Happy Friday, everyone.

Quote of the Day

In a letter to his mother, T. E. Lawrence (Lawrence of Arabia) extolled the virtues of a good book:

“…if you can get the right book at the right time you taste joys—not only bodily, physical, but spiritual also, which pass one out above and beyond one’s miserable self, as it were through a huge air, following the light of another man’s thought. And you can never be quite the old self again.”

Hard to imagine him waxing so passionate about a Kindle.

This Week’s “Awww…” Moment

Max came in to visit us today. That is all.

Wanted: Castrati. No Experience Necessary.

Turns out eunuchs live longer than, um…non-eunuchs. Nineteen years, on average. Given that folks seem to have no problem whatsoever going under the knife to look younger—often with disastrous results—we wonder whether some men might choose a much simpler procedure to actually extend their lives.

And if it does catch on, a word of warning: you might want to avoid places like these.

Celebrate!

In honor of National Punctuation Day today (yay!), The Atlantic gathered some writers to talk about their favorite marks.

If I had to choose just one, I’d probably settle on the semicolon—if for no other reason than that graphic designers hate the way it looks. Oh…and because it enables one to write much longer sentences, which graphic designers also hate.

Still Life with Awesome

It took Homo sapiens 200,000 years, but we’ve finally perfected breakfast: a cup of Cravens coffee and a still-warm flatliner from Donut Parade.

What’s the occasion? It’s Haley “The Hammer” Anderson‘s last day as AMD intern.

Normally, when someone like Haley leaves, you do something nice for her. Like buy her lunch or something. But The Hammer isn’t normal. No, she brought everyone treats this morning. And when you consider all she did over the summer—including yeoman’s work on our upcoming MAC exhibit—well…I’m not ashamed to admit that I get a little misty at the thought of her bidding adieu.

Farewell, Hammer. If my heart stops beating this morning, don’t you worry. It was totally worth it.

Stop! Grammar Time!

Here’s something that occasionally pops up: Is it into or in to?

Into is a preposition that tells the reader where. “Frank went into the café.” “Betty dove into the pool.”

In to is used when the where is understood—and to communicate intent. “Frank went in to order lunch.” “Betty dove in to escape the zombie horde.”

If there’s still some confusion, try reading the sentence out loud. Chances are, you’ll hear the difference right away.

9/11 Memorial

This is the most beautifully designed site I have ever seen. A fitting tribute to the 2,983 men, women, and children killed in the attacks of September 11, 2001—and the six victims of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

The Glass House

Tucked away in New Canaan, Connecticut, is architect Philip Johnson’s famous Glass House (1949). It and several other buildings—including the Painting Gallery (1965) and Sculpture Gallery (1970)—are located on 47 beautiful acres.

Because of our firm’s ongoing research into mid-century modern architecture for an upcoming Northwest Museum of Arts & Culture exhibit, this location was of particular interest to me.

The house itself remains completely original. (Here’s Andy Warhol visiting in 1964; you can see that little has changed since then—including the  Poussin painting and the Ludwig Mies van der Rohe Barcelona chairs, table, and couch.)

Coincidently, artist Bernard Perlin was a guest of Philip Johnson’s in the 1950s.

Revisiting the Past

In 1995 I arranged for renowned painter and World War II poster artist Bernard Perlin to visit Spokane. His arrival coincided with a propaganda poster exhibit we designed for what was then known as the Cheney Cowles Museum. Bernard gave a talk about his work for the Office of War Information and his travels during the war as an artist for Fortune and Life magazines. Among his many exploits was being on board the USS Missouri in Tokyo Bay during the Japanese surrender on September 2, 1945.

Today, Bernard lives in Ridgefield, Connecticut—and even at 93 years of age, he still paints. It was a treat for both my family and me to be able to spend the better part of a day visiting with him last week.

back to top    |     1 97 98 99 100 101 131     |    archive >